A W A R D !:
Click HERE for typical AFFIDAVIT ================================ $ 100,000,000 AWARD Page 1 of 13 ================================ [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13] ONE HUNDRED MILLION AWARD OFFERED for proof of approved Thursday 3/15/90 Board actions. HINTS: SEE ATTACHED February-March Records. in a context of 96CV774 ADMISSION REQUESTS. TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE * Those having constructive knowledge 1 * First [275] Page - 2/19/90 Meeting Minutes 2 * Last [336] Page - 2/19/90 Meeting Minutes 3 * First [337] Page - 3/26/90 Meeting Minutes 4 * Dane County 96-CV-774 Admission Requests 5 MATC BOARD AND UNION PEOPLE IN A POSITION TO HELP: Former Marquette Law School Lecturer Harry Guzniczak Current Local 212 AFT Union Agent Franklin Shansky Former Union VIP and WFT President Carston Koeller Former UNION VIP and 212 Attorney Robert Jakubiak Current MATC-Milwaukee President John Birkholz Former Union VIP and 212 President Ernst Schnook Former Union VIP and 212 President Bill Thomas Former Labor Law Expert Advocate Paul Vance.
=============================== $ 100,000,000 AWARD Page 2 of 9 =============================== [1][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13] MATC-MILWAUKEE Volume XXIII Pages 275-337 Page 275 February-March 1990 Board minutes text Milwaukee Area District Board of Vocational, Technical, and Adult Education Milwaukee, Wisconsin February 19, 1990 The regular monthly meeting of the Milwaukee Area District Board of Vocational, Technical, and Adult Education was held in open session on Monday, February 19, 1990, and called to order by Chairman Guzniczak at 5:50 p.m. in the Board Room, Room 210, of the Milwaukee Campus of the Milwaukee Area Technical College. ROLL CALL The following members responded to roll call: Cashmore, Elliott, Gill, Johnson, Keller, Parris, Vasquez, Guzniczak - 8. (Mr. Clark arrived at 6:00 p.m.) COMPLIANCE WITH THE OPEN MEETINGS LAW Chairman Guzniczak indicated that proper notice of the meeting had been given in compliance with the Open Meetings Law. CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS Minutes Minutes of the January 22, 1990, regular monthly meeting. Bills - January, 1990 The Bills were itemized, the total appearing as follows: Bills --------------------- $6,525,704.17 ========================================== 2/19/90 Board Minutes - Bottom of Page 275 ==========================================
================================ $ 100,000,000 AWARD Page 3 of 13 ================================ [1][2][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13] MATC-MILWAUKEE Volume XXIII Pages 275-337 Page 336 February-March 1990 Board minutes text February 19, 1990 It was moved by Mr. Cashmore, seconded by Mr. Keller, that the Resolution be approved. Motion carried, the vote being as follows: Ayes - Cashmore, Clark, Elliott, Gill, Johnson, Keller, Parris, Guzniczak - 8. Noes - None. Under miscellaneous business, Mr. Richard Busalacchi questioned the Board about the resolution approved last month regarding the Student Senate Board. Chairman Guzniczak indicated that a date will be set for the Senate Board to give a presentation on the structure, operations, and accountability of the Student Senate. Date of Next Regular Meeting The date of the next regular monthly meeting of the Board will be Monday, March 26, 1990. Chairman Guzniczak announced that the Board intended to convene into Closed Session pursuant to Section 19.85 (1)(e) of the Wisconsin Statutes for the consideration of possible property acquisitions and Section 19.85 (1) (c) of the Wisconsin Statutes for the review of employment data of applicants for the position of President. It was moved by Ms. Elliott, seconded by Mr. Keller, that the board convene into Closed Session pursuant to Section 19.85(1)(e) of the Wisconsin Statutes for the consideration of possible property acquisitions and Section 19.85(1)(c) of the Wisconsin Statutes for the review of employment data of applicants for the position of President. Ayes - Cashmore, Clark, Elliott, Gill, Johnson, Keller, Parris, Guzniczak - 8. Noes - None. Visitors were requested to leave the Open Session of the meeting at 7:30 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Frances Elliott, Secretary. ========================================== 2/19/90 Board Minutes - Bottom of Page 336 ==========================================
================================ $ 100,000,000 AWARD Page 4 of 13 ================================ [1][2][3][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13] MATC-MILWAUKEE Volume XXIII Pages 275-337 Page 337 February-March 1990 Board minutes text March 26, 1990 The regular monthly meeting of the Milwaukee Area District Board of Vocational, Technical, and Adult Education was held in open session on Monday, March 26, 1990, and called to order by Chairman Guzniczak at 5:50 p.m. in the Board Room, Room 210, of the Milwaukee Campus of the Milwaukee Area Technical College. ROLL CALL The following members responded to roll call: Cashmore, Elliott, Gill, Johnson, Keller, Parris, Guzniczak - 7. (Mr. Vasques arrive late, Clark was excused.) COMPLIANCE WITH THE OPEN MEETINGS LAW Chairman Guzniczak indicated that proper notice of the meeting had been given in compliance with the Open Meetings Law. CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS Minutes Minutes of the February 19, 1990, regular monthly meeting. Bills - February, 1990 The Bills were itemized, the total appearing as follows: Bills .........................$7,249,920.54 ======================================== BOTTOM OF PAGE - VOLUME XXIII - PAGE 337 ========================================
================================ $ 100,000,000 AWARD Page 5 of 13 ================================ [1][2][3][4][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13] STATE OF WISCONSIN DANE COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT ____________________________________________________ Gerhardt Steinke, Petitioner 96 CV 0774 Angela B. Bartell Judge - Branch 10 Code 30703 In the matter of an Arbitration between the Petitioner and the District Board of Milwaukee Area Technical College (MATC), Respondent ____________________________________________________ PLAINTIFF'S REQUESTS FOR ADMISSIONS...FRIDAY 8/30/96 To: Maria Myers, Davis & Kuelthau Under statutory provisions of Section 804.11 for purposes of the pending action only, the following Requests for Admissions are presented. Please respond to each matter of which an admission is requested within thirty days of service of today's documents served on you. Pursuant to Section 804.11(1)(b) of the state Statutes, today's Requests are served without leave of court. I shall use your responses in replying to your pleadings that you file on or before 9/15/96. As a courtesy I attach the following: * DOCS NEEDED TO UNDERSTAND 94-CV-9283 284 Pages * Math 155 Course Syllabus by Steinke 20 Pages ADMISSIONS REQUESTS HYPERLINKS: 1 5 9 13 17 21 25 29 33 37 41 45 49 53 57 2 6 10 14 18 22 26 30 34 38 42 46 50 54 58 3 7 11 15 19 23 27 31 35 39 43 47 51 55 59 4 8 12 16 20 24 28 32 36 40 44 48 52 56 60
================================ $ 100,000,000 AWARD Page 6 of 13 ================================ [1][2][3][4][5][7][8][9][10][11][12][13] 1. The Arbitrator agreed to rule on the question of whether or not the MATC Board had violated their Collective Bargaining Agreement in their actions transpiring on Thursday 3/15/90. Such Actions are found in Case 96-CV-774 Steinke Exhibit A. 2. There was no directly stated stipulation as to what remedy he would order should the MATC Board be found in violation. 3. Steinke's claims of "no clear stipulation" were accepted by Miller and marked as Steinke Exhibit One. In Case 96-CV-774 Petitioner Steinke identified this as Exhibit D. 4. The Arbitrator has a legal duty to draw the essence of any award from the parties' Collective Bargaining Agreement as will be referred to subsequently as the MATC/UNION CBA. 5. Where the parties have incorporated statutory rights into their agreement, it is an arbitrator's duty to interpret the respective CBA consistent with state and federal law. 6. To violate Section 118.22(3) is to violate the above CBA. 7. To violate Section 118.23(3) is to violate the above CBA. 8. To violate Section 38.12(4) is to violate the above CBA. 9. To violate any of Chapter 38 is to violate the CBA. 10. To violate Section 19.85(1)(a) is to violate the above CBA.
================================ $ 100,000,000 AWARD Page 7 of 13 ================================ [1][2][3][4][5][6][8][9][10][11][12][13] 11. To violate Section 19.21(6) is to violate the above CBA. 12. To violate any of Chapter 19 is to violate the CBA. 13. No evidence exists showing anyone at MATC posting any Notice or Agenda prior to 3/15/90 series of meetings. 14. No evidence exists showing any subsequent approval by the MATC Board of any supposed actions from 3/15/90. 15. The only action taken by the 3/15/90 Board was that of going into closed session after citing Section 19.85(1)(a). 16. To violate any of the WI Criminal Code dealing with perjury or destruction of evidence is to violate the CBA. 17. Maria Myers has no first-hand personal knowledge of any arbitral session held under Dr. Richard Ulric Miller having anything to do with Steinke's grievance. 18. Attorney Myers must rely on Mark Olson in her attempts to learn about the arbitration. She works near Olson. 19. Myers has easy immediate access to all documents that Olson generated or collected dealing with the Steinke arbitration. This includes all correspondence between the parties, all Exhibits of all parties and transcripts. 20. Mark L. Olson repeatedly stated that "all requirements of the Open Meetings Law" were followed on 3/15/90.
================================ $ 100,000,000 AWARD Page 8 of 13 ================================ [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][9][10][11][12][13] 21. At all material times, the MATC Chairperson retains the responsibility to see that proposed meetings are in proper compliance with the Open Meeting Law. Although delegation may occur, the Chair can not evade responsibility for the legal requirements of the Open Meeting Law. The Chairman of the MATC Board on Thursday 15 March 1990 was Guzniczak. 22. No one at the Milwaukee Journal was noticed BEFORE 3/15/90 of any planned MATC Board Meeting to be held on this date. 23. MATC keeps records of all such notices to the media. Sylvia Cody has years of experience in documenting such notices. 24. MATC keeps Affidavits of Posting of all Board Meetings that document where and when supposed Notices and Agendas were posted in a manner "reasonably" designed to apprise public. 25. No one at MATC has any records of any postings for 3/15/90. 26. All Board actions MUST be approved and memorialized in type before they have any legal standing. This practice has been in place for at least fifty (50) years or so. No approved typeset paginated non-fraudulent MATC 3/15/90 Board Minutes exist having anything to do with Thursday 15 March 1990.
================================ $ 100,000,000 AWARD Page 9 of 13 ================================ [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][10][11][12][13] 27. Under the requirements of Section 38.12(4) the MATC Board must buy space in the Milwaukee Journal within forty-five (45) days of each board meeting and publish all Board action items. The Board is required to keep records of all payments to the Milwaukee Journal needed to pay for the publication. 28. The MATC Board must keep financial records showing above. No record exists showing any such publishing having any probative relevance to the above legally required ads. 29. Maloney created claimed "Notice and Minutes" for 3/15/90. Six (6) requesters of records asked for the above records. 30. These documents were first released in January of 1992. 31. Maloney belatedly admitted in December of 1994, that his so-called minutes were only a "draft" and that he assumed that Slicker and Guzniczak (Maloney's client!) would take care of the legal requirements. Maloney violates the law. 32. Rus Slicker testified in arbitration that "Maloney and Vance" took care of everything. NOBODY "took care of" ANYTHING. 33. Nothing generated by Maloney, Olson, Vance, Slicker or any others closely associated with convicted felon Guzniczak show ANYONE taking care of ANYTHING regarding 3/15/90. 34. Any citizen (including lawyers associated with Guzniczak) can easily verify existence of non-fraudulent MATC Board minutes by reviewing minutes for any date.
================================= $ 100,000,000 AWARD Page 10 of 13 ================================= [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][11][12][13] Such minutes are kept in all four (4) MATC libraries, in President's office, at the City Hall Legislative Research Library and dozens of other places, including the state WTCS offices. 35. For Maria Myers (or anyone else) to repeatedly state "all requirements of the Open Meetings Law were complied with on Thursday 3/15/90" comprises a felony under WI statutes. 36. Former MATC Board VIP Harry E. Guzniczak is an admitted and convicted felon. 37. His conviction addressed crimes at MATC and Franklin. 38. Maria Myers has constructive knowledge that NONE of the legal requirements for non-fraudulent legal meetings of the MATC Board (under chair Guzniczak) were met on Thursday 15 March 1990. Her "mechanically repeating" anything to the contrary is a fraud on the court(s). 39. Guzniczak has constructive knowledge as per above #38. 40. John Maloney has constructive knowledge as per above #38. 41. Paul Vance has constructive knowledge as per Myers in #38. 42. Olson has constructive knowledge similar to Myers in #38. 43. Rus Slicker has constructive knowledge as per Myers in #38.
================================= $ 100,000,000 AWARD Page 11 of 13 ================================= [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][12][13] 44. Pamela Schmidt has constructive knowledge as per above #38. 45. John Busch has constructive knowledge of above as per #38. 46. MATC has records on former student Stanley Perushek. See pages 50, 186, 187, 199, 200, 246, 252, 265, 266, 270, 281 of attached. 47. Olson called one (1) student for testimony in arbitration. The student called (upon two days notice) was Mr. Perushek. 48. Board Attorney Olson suborned perjury from cited Perushek. See the pages cited in #46 for the perjuries committed. 49. It's a crime under WI Law to commit or suborn perjury. 50. To commit a crime is to violate the above CBA. 51. One of the reasons given for firing Steinke was that his syllabi were no good. The attached MATH 155 syllabi shows a syllabi typical of Steinke's work as retained by MATC. 52. MATC has not legally destroyed any records since 1966 in compliance with the plain word meaning of Section 19.21(6). Please See 71 Atty. Gen.9. to refresh your memory on this. 53. MATC has ignored virtually all written records requests from Steinke ever since the hiring of Roden in 1992. 54. Steinke was unable to present key evidence in arbitration.
================================= $ 100,000,000 AWARD Page 12 of 13 ================================= [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][13] 55. Steinke did NOT rest his arbitral case. THE MATC BOARD DID. 56. The Arbitrator, Dr. Richard Ulric Miller, has constructive knowledge of above negative evidence pertaining to 3/15/90. 57. Non-existence of non-fraudulent legally approved paginated, typeset MATC-Milwaukee Board minutes was readily apparent on the "Plant Tour" of MATC taken by Dr. Miller, Mr. Olson, Mr. Koeller and Mr. Steinke after last arbitral session. On this tour, Miller refused to look at official MATC board minutes that covered all documented 1989-90 board actions. 58. The Union did nothing to support Steinke in the arbitration with respect to obtaining needed corroborative evidence. 59. The Arbitrator engaged in ex part activity when he wrote letters (or sent invoices to) the Union and MATC without copying Steinke. Everything he sent to the other parties should have also been sent to Steinke. Requests to be paid (He earned about a hundred grand) are not excepted. 60. Steinke had no opportunity to review the documents sent to Miller by Maloney (felon Guzniczak's attorney). This represents ex parte activity and is highly improper.
================================= $ 100,000,000 AWARD Page 13 of 13 ================================= [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12] In closing, please remember that an answering party to Requests for Admissions may not give lack of information or knowledge as a reason for failure to admit or deny unless the party states that he or she has made reasonable inquiry . . . . I assume that you are only a few minutes away from ascertaining what is needed for rational responses to the above 60 requests. Please feel free to review any of Steinke's arbitral exhibits. Thank you for your considered attention to the above requests. Gerhardt J. Steinke 6415 Bridge Road 204 Madison WI 53213 File: 960830MM.RFA =================================================== 1947-96 MINUTES KEPT in Birkholz office, all four of the MATC-Milwaukee Libraries, at the Main Milwaukee Public Library and at City Hall Municipal Library. ==================================================
|